1 Analyses of this case by attorneys

  1. Oral Argument Preview: Interpreting the Meaning of “Transacting Business” under R.C. 4117.13(D). Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority v. State Employment Relations Board et al.

    University of Cincinnati College of LawMarianna Brown BettmanAugust 12, 2016

    Davlan Engineering, Inc. v. NLRB, 718 F.2d 102, 103 (4th Cir. 1983) (Davlan did not transact business in the 4th Circuit, having “neither any permanent physical facility nor any employees situated here.”)Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. NLRB, 546 F.3d 318, 321 (5th Cir. 2008) (It was significant but not necessarily dispositive that Bally’s did not maintain a physical presence in the Fifth Circuit. Bally’s did not demonstrate that it transacts business in the circuit because to do so requires more than individuals within the circuit “connecting with Bally’s through the commonplace and universal reach of modern technology.”)