From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1938
199 S.E. 25 (N.C. 1938)

Opinion

(Filed 12 October, 1938.)

Eminent Domain § 12 — In awarding damages for relocation of highway, both special and general benefits should be allowed as offsets.

In an action to recover damages resulting from the relocation of a public road through the lands of plaintiff, both the special and general benefits accruing to plaintiff by reason of the construction of the highway should be allowed as offsets against any damages which plaintiff might have sustained, Michie's Code, 3846 (bb), and an instruction that limits offsets to special advantages that accrued to plaintiff is erroneous.

APPEAL by the defendant from Alley, J., at April Term, 1938, of BUNCOMBE. New trial.

C. E. Blackstock and R. M. Wells for plaintiff, appellee.

Charles Ross for defendant, appellant.


CLARKSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


This is a civil action to recover damages resulting from the relocation of a public road through the lands of the plaintiff.

From a verdict and judgment awarding plaintiff the sum of $2,500 the defendant appeals, assigning error.


The appellant assigns as error the following excerpt from his Honor's charge: "So, in arriving at the compensation which the plaintiff ought to receive, the jury should estimate the value of the land taken and the damage, if any, to the rest of the plaintiff's tract by reason of the location and construction of the road and from such sum there should be taken as a counterclaim or set-off any benefits which the plaintiff has sustained by reason of the addition to the value, if any, of his tract of land by reason of the special advantages thereto which is not shown to the lands of others in that section." We are constrained to sustain this assignment.

The statute, N.C. Code of 1935 (Michie), sec. 3846 (bb), provides, inter alia, that "Whenever the State Highway Commission and the owner or owners of the lands, materials, and timber required by the State Highway Commission to carry on the work as herein provided for, are unable to agree as to the price thereof, the State Highway Commission is hereby vested with the power to condemn the lands, materials, and timber, and in so doing the ways, means, methods and procedure of chapter thirty-three, entitled `Eminent Domain,' shall be used by it as near as the same is suitable for the purposes of this law, and in all instances the general and special benefits shall be assessed as offsets against damages; . . ." The vice of the instruction to which exception is reserved consists in the limiting of the amount of the offsets against any damages which the plaintiff might have sustained to the special advantages that accrued to him. Such offsets should also include the general benefits accruing to the plaintiff by reason of the construction of the highway. Wade v. Highway Commission, 188 N.C. 210; Goode v. Asheville, 193 N.C. 134.

For the error assigned, there must be a

New trial.

CLARKSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1938
199 S.E. 25 (N.C. 1938)
Case details for

Bailey v. Highway Commission

Case Details

Full title:V. B. BAILEY v. STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1938

Citations

199 S.E. 25 (N.C. 1938)
199 S.E. 25

Citing Cases

Switzerland Co. v. Highway Commission

signment of error is to the following excerpt from the charge, to wit: "Therefore, gentlemen of the jury, in…

Highway Commission v. Black

The rule of law is simply this: Where the State, or one of its agencies or subdivisions, or a public utility…