From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Columbian Rope Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 1918
172 N.Y.S. 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

November 13, 1918.

Jeremiah F. Connor, for the appellants.

Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General [ E.C. Aiken, Deputy Attorney-General, of counsel], Robert W. Bonynge, counsel for the State Industrial Commission, for the respondents.


By subdivision 4 of section 16 of the Workmen's Compensation Law, an award to a dependent mother is only payable during her dependency.

In Adams v. New York, Ontario Western R. Co. ( 175 App. Div. 714; 220 N.Y. 579) it was held that the Commission could not commute future payments directed to be made to a widow during widowhood. After that decision it was provided, by chapter 705 of the Laws of 1917, that commutations under section 27 shall be upon the basis of the Survivorship Annuitants' Table of Mortality and the Remarriage Tables of the Dutch Royal Insurance Institution. That amendment was intended to permit the commutation of an award payable to a widow during widowhood, and to fix a basis for such commutation. But that basis would not apply to an award during dependency. Neither would a life table furnish any basis for such commutation. It is evident that the Commission treated the award in this case as one payable during life, but by subdivision 4 of section 16 of the Workmen's Compensation Law it continues only during dependency. The Commission cannot determine that such an award is of value equal to a life award and compute it on that basis. The appeal, therefore, is governed by the Adams case.

The decision should be reversed.

All concurred.

Determination reversed.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Columbian Rope Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 1918
172 N.Y.S. 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

Bailey v. Columbian Rope Co.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1918

Citations

172 N.Y.S. 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
172 N.Y.S. 566

Citing Cases

Matter of Wagner v. Wilson Co.

Amendments of the statute have made it possible in such circumstances to have recourse to the Dutch tables. A…

Matter of Szuba v. Laub's Sons

That case arose under the statute as it existed prior to 1917. Section 27 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's…