From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ash v. Ash

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 21, 1937
273 N.W. 446 (Mich. 1937)


Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 39,344.

Submitted April 14, 1937.

Decided May 21, 1937.

Appeal from Wayne; Jayne (Ira W.), J. Submitted April 14, 1937. (Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 39,344.) Decided May 21, 1937.

Bill by Lillian Ash against Michael Ash for a divorce on grounds of extreme cruelty and for an injunction. From decree for plaintiff granting divorce and setting aside deed from defendant to plaintiff, plaintiff appeals. Reversed as to provision setting aside deed.

Walter Phillips and William R. Brandt, for plaintiff.

Plaintiff filed bill for divorce against defendant September 3, 1935. Defendant filed an answer and cross-bill. Plaintiff's right to a decree of divorce was not contested. Defendant offered no testimony. There is no contest over plaintiff's right to a divorce here.

The only question in dispute arises over the trial court having set aside a quitclaim deed from defendant to plaintiff of real estate, their then home, held by them as tenants by the entirety.

Defendant left home July 6, 1935, and about two weeks later sent to his wife a quitclaim deed of his interest in the property in question. There is no testimony of fraud, undue influence, coercion, want of consideration, or other thing tending to invalidate the deed in question.

Defendant could terminate the tenancy by the entirety by a conveyance of his interest in the land to his wife. 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13069.

The deed in question purports to have been made for a valuable consideration, — and even though it was a purely voluntary conveyance, it would be valid as between the parties. Draper v. Brown, 153 Mich. 120; Wipfler v. Wipfler, 153 Mich. 18 (16 L.R.A. [N. S.] 941); Coleman v. Coleman, 239 Mich. 139.

The deed was valid. That part of the decree of the trial court setting the same aside and dividing the real estate between the parties is set aside, with costs to plaintiff.


Summaries of

Ash v. Ash

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 21, 1937
273 N.W. 446 (Mich. 1937)
Case details for

Ash v. Ash

Case Details

Full title:ASH v. ASH

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 21, 1937


273 N.W. 446 (Mich. 1937)
273 N.W. 446

Citing Cases

Tkachik v. Mandeville

The one exception to this rule is statutory: MCL 557.101 allows either spouse to convey to the other spouse…

Takacs v. Takacs

"The deeds, intended by the father to vest title to the property in his son as a voluntary gift, required no…