From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 993 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued February 9, 1983

Decided March 22, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, FREDERICK M. MARSHALL, J.

Robert A. Dean for appellant.

Joseph M. Schnitter and Neil A. Goldberg for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The motion papers presented no question of fact for trial sufficient to negate the validity and binding effect of the disclaimer of warranty coverage. In addition, on the facts of this case, there being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant there can be no implied warranty.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1983
58 N.Y.2d 993 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR JAFFEE ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. BILSCO AUTO SERVICE, INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1983

Citations

58 N.Y.2d 993 (N.Y. 1983)
461 N.Y.S.2d 1007
448 N.E.2d 792

Citing Cases

Luciano v. Volkswagen Corp.

In our view, summary judgment should have been granted dismissing all causes of action against WWV. As to…

Carbo Industries, Inc. v. Becker Chevrolet

Although an automobile dealer may, by statute, disclaim both express and implied warranties (Uniform…