Arnett v. Dal Cielo

2 Analyses of this case by attorneys

  1. Cal.4: SDT for financial records in a pollution investigation to properly assess penalty was reaosnable

    Law Offices of John Wesley HallFebruary 12, 2020

    Appellants have not shown any error on this record. (See Tom v. Schoolhouse Coins (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 827, 830 [236 Cal. Rptr. 541] (Tom) [compelling production of various business records, including complete customer list with customers’ identities, where there was “a sufficiently compelling governmental interest in identifying and rectifying violations of the securities laws to justify the de minimus intrusion” on any privacy interests held by the customers]; see also Arnett v. Dal Cielo (1996) 14 Cal.4th 4, 6, 24 [56 Cal. Rptr. 2d 706, 923 P.2d 1] [peer review records that were protected by statute and not subject to discovery were nonetheless subject to disclosure in response to an investigative subpoena].)The subpoena process itself guarantees limited use and precludes unauthorized disclosure of Appellants’ financial information.

  2. DANA POINT BEACH COLLECTIVE, a California non-profit Mutual Benefit corporation, Petitioner, RT

    Garfield Langmuir LoganNovember 7, 2015

    24Page 3(ASE Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 696 l8, l9 Amett v. Dal Cielo (1996) 14 Cal.4th 4 17 Auto Equity Sales v. County of Santa Clara (1962) 57 Cal. 2d 450 --------------- -- 9 Barnes v. Molino (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 46 17 Bishop v. Merging Capital, Inc., (1996). 49 Cal.App.4th 1803 ---------- -- 2, passim Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669 16 City of Santa Cruz v. Patel (2007) 155 Cal. App. 4th 134 --------------- --10, passim City of Vacaville v. Pitamber (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 739 ------------------------ --16 Collins v. Corie (1936) 8 Cal. 2d 120), 18 Fielder v. Berkeley Properties Co. (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 30 --------------------- --16 Franchise Tax Board v. Barnhart (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 274 -------------------- --17 H.D. Arnaiz , Ltd. v. County of San Joaquin (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1357 ------ --14 Millan v. Restaurant Enterprises Group, Inc.(1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 477, 3, passim Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390 9, passim People ex rel.