From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aristequieta v. Jimenez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 1, 1960
274 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1960)

Summary

holding that appellate court may review an interlocutory decision of district court made in the course of extradition proceedings

Summary of this case from In re Extradition of Ghandtchi

Opinion

No. 18176.

February 1, 1960.

Shearman Sterling Wright, New York City, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Miami, Fla., attorneys for appellants-petitioners First Nat. City Bank of New York.

Coudert Brothers, New York City, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Miami, Fla., for appellants-petitioners French American Banking Corp.

Sage, Gray, Todd Sims, New York City, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Miami, Fla., attorneys-petitioners Royal Bank of Canada.

Walter Humkey, Miami, Fla., John A. Wilson, Melber Chambers, Herman E. Compter, Alexis C. Coudert, New York City, of counsel for appellants-petitioners.

Ward Ward, Miami, Fla., Covington Burling, Sachs Jacobs, Washington, D.C. (William G. Ward, Miami, Fla., Howard C. Westwood, David C. Acheson, William H. Allen, Sidney S. Sachs, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee, Manuel Aristeguieta.

Malcolm R. Wilkey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert S. Erdahl, Harold P. Shapiro, Joseph J. Cella, Jr., Washington, D.C., for the United States as amicus curiae.

Walters, Moore Costanzo, Miami, Fla. (David W. Walters, Miami, Fla., of counsel), for defendant.

Richard H. Hunt, Miami, Fla., for petitioners Fortunato Herrera and Polinversiones, C.A.

Smathers, Thompson Dyer, Miami, Fla. (Samuel A. Brodnax, Jr., Miami, Fla., of counsel), for petitioner Silvio Gutierrez.

Scott, McCarthy, Preston, Steel Gilleland, Miami, Fla. (Dwight Sullivan, Miami, Fla., of counsel), for petitioner Napoleon Dupouy.

L.J. Cushman, Miami, Fla., for petitioners Pedro A. Gutierres Alfaro and Loal T. de Gutierrez Alfaro.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and JONES, Circuit Judges.


The appeal of the First National Bank of New York, the French American Banking Corporation, and the Royal Bank of Canada from an order denying a motion to quash three subpoenas duces tecum, issued on behalf of the demanding country in the extradition proceedings first hereinabove styled, and the motions for leave to file petitions for writ of prohibition or mandamus in all the other captioned causes, were argued and heard together. It was stipulated upon oral argument that final judgment might be entered as if leave to file the petitions for writ of prohibition or mandamus had been granted and those cases had been heard on the merits.

The court has carefully read and considered the briefs together with the oral arguments and has reached a conclusion. In view of the need for expedition, that conclusion is announced without opinion.

The court decides that the order denying motions to quash the subpoenas duces tecum is final and appealable. A majority of the court concludes that the said order should be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to quash the subpoenas duces tecum.

In view of the conclusions above announced, the petitions for the writ of prohibition or mandamus are denied.

The clerk is directed to enter judgments accordingly.

RIVES, Chief Judge, thinks that the order should be affirmed, and, therefore, respectfully dissents.


Summaries of

Aristequieta v. Jimenez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 1, 1960
274 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1960)

holding that appellate court may review an interlocutory decision of district court made in the course of extradition proceedings

Summary of this case from In re Extradition of Ghandtchi
Case details for

Aristequieta v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:Manuel ARISTEQUIETA, Counsel General of Republic of Venezuela, on behalf…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 1, 1960

Citations

274 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

Wacker v. Bisson

This proceeding is not an appeal from an extradition order, but a proceeding for collateral review of the…

Jimenez v. Aristeguieta

The Supreme Court on March 20, 1961 granted certiorari to review the decisions of both Circuits, and most of…