Ambrose
v.
Brown

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New YorkMay 28, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 75027 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

DOCKET NO. CA 15-00774 DOCKET NO. CA 15-00775

05-28-2015

DENISE AMBROSE AND DAVID AMBROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF MADELEINE AMBROSE, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES E. BROWN, JR., M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, SUCHITRA KAVETY, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER, AGENT AND/OR EMPLOYEE OF ASSOCIATES FOR WOMEN'S MEDICINE, JANE FIELDS, C.N.M., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER, AGENT AND/OR EMPLOYEE OF ASSOCIATES FOR WOMEN'S MEDICINE, ASSOCIATES FOR WOMEN'S MEDICINE, BY AND THROUGH ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) DENISE AMBROSE AND DAVID AMBROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS


PRESENT:

Defendants-appellants having moved to consolidate the appeals taken herein from a decision of the Supreme Court dated November 21, 2014, and an order of said court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Onondaga on March 12, 2015,

Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Nancy E. May-Skinner, Esq., sworn to May 4, 2015, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appeal and cross appeal from the order entered March 12, 2015, are hereby consolidated for the purposes of perfection and argument, and the motion is otherwise denied, and

It is further ORDERED that the appeal from the decision dated November 21, 2014, is dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: No appeal lies form an oral decision (see CPLR 5512 [a]; Oppenheim & Co., P.C. v Berstein, 198 AD2d 163).

Entered: May 28, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk