Allen
v.
City of Oakland

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONDec 20, 2012
Case No.: C00-4599 TEH (NC) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2012)

Case No.: C00-4599 TEH (NC)

12-20-2012

DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.

JOHN L. BURRIS, STATE BAR NO. 69888 Law Offices of John L. Burris Airport Corporate Centre JAMES B. CHANIN, STATE BAR NO. 76043 JULIE M. HOUK, STATE BAR NO. 114968 Law Offices of James B. Chanin Attorneys for Plaintiffs


JOHN L. BURRIS, STATE BAR NO. 69888
Law Offices of John L. Burris
Airport Corporate Centre
JAMES B. CHANIN, STATE BAR NO. 76043
JULIE M. HOUK, STATE BAR NO. 114968
Law Offices of James B. Chanin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR THE

FILING OF THE PARTIES' PROPOSED

CANDIDATES FOR COMPLIANCE

DIRECTOR

WHEREAS, on December 12, 2012, the Court entered its Order re: Compliance Director in the above entitled action which, in part, required that the parties file their proposals for Compliance Director under seal with the Court, jointly or separately, by December 21, 2012;

WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to meet and confer concerning the candidates for Compliance Director, are continuing to interview candidates for the position and have requested that the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins assist the parties in this process; and,

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to meet and confer further in person on December 27, 2012 to discuss the Compliance Director position, criteria and/or candidates with the assistance of Judge Cousins via telephone conference call;

THE PARTIES DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT they are jointly respectfully requesting that the Court extend the deadline for the parties to file their proposals for Compliance Director, jointly and/or separately, through Friday, January 11, 2013. IT IS SO STIPULATED:

______________


Paul B. Mello


Attorney for Defendants


______________


Julie M. Houk


Attorney for Plaintiff
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

______________


Thelton E. Henderson


Judge of the United States District Court