ALIv.DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville DivisionApr 15, 2009
NO. 3:09-0026 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 15, 2009)

NO. 3:09-0026.

April 15, 2009


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


JOHN BRYANT, Magistrate Judge

This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation on dispositive motions (Docket Entry No. 4).

Defendant has filed its motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 9) on grounds of mootness and resulting lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Specifically, defendant asserts that plaintiff's application for naturalization has now been approved, and that plaintiff was scheduled to participate in a naturalization ceremony on March 27, 2009, rendering plaintiff's claims moot.

After plaintiff failed to respond to this motion, the Court entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause why defendant's motion to dismiss should not be granted (Docket Entry No. 11). In response, plaintiff filed a handwritten statement (Docket Entry No. 13), which the undersigned Magistrate Judge interprets as stating: "I, Adnan S. Mohammed Ali, dismiss my court day because I got my ceremony," allowing for misspellings. Given this statement, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that plaintiff does not oppose defendant's motion to dismiss on grounds of mootness.

RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons stated above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that defendant's motion to dismiss be GRANTED and that the complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice.

Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has ten (10) days from service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation, with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have ten (10) days from receipt of any objections filed in this Report in which to file any responses to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within ten (10) days of receipt of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation.Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986).