United States District Court, E.D. CaliforniaMar 19, 2009
No. CIV S-08-1997 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2009)

No. CIV S-08-1997 FCD EFB PS.

March 19, 2009


FRANK DAMRELL JR., District Judge

On January 27, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
The court notes in passing that plaintiff filed a letter on February 23, 2009. The letter neither contains a new address to allow the court to effect re-service of the findings and recommendations nor addresses the magistrate judge's January 27, 2009, findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 27, 2009, are ADOPTED; and,

2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the federal and local rules of court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L. R. 11-110.