Agm-Nevada, LLCv.Steigelman

United States District Court, D. New MexicoOct 17, 2011
No. 1:10-cv-01045-MV/RHS (D.N.M. Oct. 17, 2011)

No. 1:10-cv-01045-MV/RHS.

October 17, 2011

S. Charles Archuleta, Neil R. Bell, Albuquerque, NM, Attorneys for AGM-Nevada.

Dylan O'Reilly, William T. Denning, Miller Stratvert, PA, Farmington, NM, Attorneys for Defendant Steigelman.

B. Paul Briones, Briones Law Firm, PA, Farmington, NM, Attorneys for Certain Corporate Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING THE COURT'S RULING ON MOTIONS AFFECTING THE SCOPE OF DISCOVERY


ROBERT SCOTT, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Court's Ruling on Motions Affecting the Scope of Discovery [Doc. 59]. The Court has now considered the motion, as well as all of the pleadings on file in the above-captioned cause and hereby concludes that the motion is well-taken and should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. The Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Court's Ruling on Motions Affecting the Scope of Discovery is hereby granted, and the proceeding is stayed until the Court rules on Defendant John M. Steigelman's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Doc. 36] and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 40].
2. All scheduling deadlines are extended by sixty (60) days from the date that the Court rules on the above-referenced motions.
3. Each party shall bear their respective attorney's fees and costs relative to the instant motion.