From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aero Products v. R. E. Darling

U.S.
Oct 11, 1965
382 U.S. 843 (1965)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

stressing that the trial court had noted that, in sentencing, it had placed no great weight on the challenged information; as the appellate court said, ". . . there is not the slightest reason to doubt that the trial judge meant what he said in specifying the basis for his sentence."

Summary of this case from Moore v. United States
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

No. 328.

October 11, 1965.

Abe Fortas, Dennis G. Lyons, Joseph Sherbow, Edward F. Shea, Jr., and Rourke J. Sheehan for petitioners.

James P. Donovan and Jack H. Olender for respondent.

Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.Reported below: 238 Md. 93, 208 A. 2d74.

Summaries of

Aero Products v. R. E. Darling

U.S.
Oct 11, 1965
382 U.S. 843 (1965)

stressing that the trial court had noted that, in sentencing, it had placed no great weight on the challenged information; as the appellate court said, ". . . there is not the slightest reason to doubt that the trial judge meant what he said in specifying the basis for his sentence."

Summary of this case from Moore v. United States

stating "[f]ew things can be so relevant as other criminal activity of the defendant," so that to argue " 'the presumption of innocence is affronted by considering unproved criminal activity is as implausible as taking the double jeopardy clause to bar reference to past convictions' "

Summary of this case from Buoni v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Ins.

stating "[f]ew things can be so relevant as other criminal activity of the defendant," so that to argue " 'the presumption of innocence is affronted by considering unproved criminal activity is as implausible as taking the double jeopardy clause to bar reference to past convictions' "

Summary of this case from State v. Buoni
Case details for

Aero Products v. R. E. Darling

Case Details

Full title:SPACE AERO PRODUCTS CO., INC., ET AL. v. R. E. DARLING CO., INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 11, 1965

Citations

382 U.S. 843 (1965)

Citing Cases

USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.

Moreover, it is conceivable that "the USM machine, the special features thereof and the combination and…

U.S. v. Baylin

he wide breadth of § 3577, the courts have consistently rebuffed challenges both to the substance of…

198 Citing Cases