From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 18, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2237 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2237 DFL JFM P.

September 18, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to court order, the parties have filed a joint status report. After review of the report, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty days from the date of this order respondents shall file either a motion to dismiss this action as barred by the statute of limitations or notice of withdrawal of said defense. Any motion so filed shall be noticed for hearing on this court's regular law and motion calendar and briefed in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 78-230(m).

2. Further proceedings in this matter are deferred pending resolution of the statute of limitations defense raised by respondent in the joint status report.


Summaries of

Adams v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 18, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2237 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Adams v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN ADAMS, Petitioner, v. TERESA SCHWARTZ, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2237 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2006)