From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Nov 4, 2009
5:08CV00343HLJ (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2009)

Opinion

5:08CV00343HLJ.

November 4, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to compel (DE #43). Defendants have filed a response in opposition to the motion (DE #49).

In support of the motion to compel, plaintiff states he submitted interrogatories and requests for production of documents to the medical defendants on August 17, 2009. Plaintiff further states a letter from defendants dated September 16, 2009 requested a two-week extension, and that he has not yet received defendants' responses.

Defendants respond to the motion by stating that their responses were mailed to plaintiff on October 2, 2009, within the two-week extension period, and that plaintiff's motion should be denied. In light of defendants' response, the Court will deny the motion, without prejudice. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (DE #43) is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Nov 4, 2009
5:08CV00343HLJ (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Adams v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:BILLY TIRRELL ADAMS, ADC # 101322 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

5:08CV00343HLJ (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2009)