From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abate v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

U.S.
Oct 21, 1974
419 U.S. 900 (1974)

Summary

finding that the attorney-client privilege did not attach to communication between the insurance company and its attorney as against the assignee of the insured's claims against the insurance company

Summary of this case from Med. Assurance Co. v. Weinberger

Opinion

No. 74-64.

October 21, 1974, October TERM, 1974.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 494 F. 2d 799.


Summaries of

Abate v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

U.S.
Oct 21, 1974
419 U.S. 900 (1974)

finding that the attorney-client privilege did not attach to communication between the insurance company and its attorney as against the assignee of the insured's claims against the insurance company

Summary of this case from Med. Assurance Co. v. Weinberger

finding that the attorney-client privilege did not attach to communication between the insurance company and its attorney as against the assignee of the insured's claims against the insurance company

Summary of this case from McGrath v. Everest National Insurance Company
Case details for

Abate v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

Case Details

Full title:ABATE ET AL. v. PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS Co. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 21, 1974

Citations

419 U.S. 900 (1974)
95 S. Ct. 184

Citing Cases

Adams v. Robertson

ement: (1) the likelihood of success at trial (including the likelihood of establishing liability on the part…

United States v. Miranda

Moreover, it is at least doubtful whether the District of Columbia Circuit has materially altered that…