From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A10 Networks, Inc. v. Brocade Commc'n Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Jan 4, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05493 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05493 LHK

01-04-2012

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Mark A. Flagel (Bar No. 110635) Ryan E. Hatch (Bar No. 235577) Jessica C. Kronstadt (Bar No. 267959) LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Dean G. Dunlavey (Bar No. 115530) Attorneys for Plaintiff A10 NETWORKS, INC. FABIO E. MARINO Attorneys for Defendant BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.


LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Mark A. Flagel (Bar No. 110635)

Ryan E. Hatch (Bar No. 235577)

Jessica C. Kronstadt (Bar No. 267959)

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Dean G. Dunlavey (Bar No. 115530)

Attorneys for Plaintiff A10 NETWORKS, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING A10 NETWORKS, INC.

TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Dept: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor

Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

WHEREAS Plaintiff A10 Networks, Inc. ("A10") and Defendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. ("Brocade") had agreed to allow A10 to review Brocade confidential information under the provisions of the Protective Order in order to allow for further investigation into the allegations of the Complaint filed in this action; and

WHEREAS, further to that agreement, A10 (through its counsel) has reviewed and is continuing to review certain such information and as a result wishes to amend its Complaint in this action;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between A10 and Brocade, that:

A10 shall be permitted to file its First Amended Complaint on or before January 10, 2012. Brocade shall answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint, and need not answer or otherwise respond to the original Complaint filed in this action.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

RYAN E. HATCH

Attorneys for Plaintiff A10 NETWORKS, INC.

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

FABIO E. MARINO

Attorneys for Defendant

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

A10 Networks, Inc. v. Brocade Commc'n Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Jan 4, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05493 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

A10 Networks, Inc. v. Brocade Commc'n Sys. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. BROCADEā€¦

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-05493 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)