From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

166 West 87th Street Corporation v. Newland

City Court of the City of New York
Dec 1, 1922
119 Misc. 667 (N.Y. City Ct. 1922)

Opinion

December, 1922.

Alexander Ash, for plaintiff.

Alexander Coblitz, for defendant Newland.

Glasser Rohrlich, for defendant Marks.


This is an action by a landlord against tenants for rent. The defendants served their answers herein in which they raised the issue of reasonableness and fairness of the rent sued for, but failed to comply with the requirements of the statute (Laws of 1921, chap. 434, § 6, Emergency Rent Laws) in that they did not make the deposit therein required. Upon motion said answers were stricken out in their entirety, as they contained only the denials and defenses tending to raise said issue. The defendants now take the position that they are in default for pleading and ask leave to serve their answers herein. Milton Holding Corp. v. Gross, 193 N.Y.S. 75. As the defendants in good faith The issue with plaintiff they should be given their day in court. take view urged by plaintiff that defendants, having failed to make the deposit as required by statute, the right to do so is gone forever does not meet with the favorable consideration of the court; nor is there a ruling of an appellate court to sustain plaintiff's point. The statutory obligation on the defendant, raising the issue of reasonableness and fairness in an action for rent, to make the specified deposit, is of no greater force nor does non-compliance therewith carry more dire results than in the case of the failure of a landlord, suing for rent, to file a bill of particulars. Laws of 1921, chap. 434, § 2. Remissness in this respect on the part of the landlord has been condoned and the default opened and permission granted to file the bill required by statute. 1217-1219-1221 Madison Ave. Corp. v. Hyman, 192 N.Y.S. 899. The tenant, in a proper case, should also be relieved of his default in making the deposit required by statute. Paterno Const. Co. v. Rentner, 116 Misc. 642. These motions are, therefore, granted upon condition that, on or before December 13, 1922, said defendants pay ten dollars costs each, serve their proposed answers and make the statutory deposits.

Orders signed.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

166 West 87th Street Corporation v. Newland

City Court of the City of New York
Dec 1, 1922
119 Misc. 667 (N.Y. City Ct. 1922)
Case details for

166 West 87th Street Corporation v. Newland

Case Details

Full title:166 WEST 87TH STREET CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v . WILLIAM C. NEWLAND, DAVID…

Court:City Court of the City of New York

Date published: Dec 1, 1922

Citations

119 Misc. 667 (N.Y. City Ct. 1922)