Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
393 F.3d 1111 (10th Cir. 2004) Cited 1,031 timesHolding that a district court's entry of judgment without expressly ruling on an objection is tantamount to a denial or rejection of those arguments when there is no basis to conclude the court did not consider the objections
Alpine View Co. v. Atlas Copco AB
205 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 2000) Cited 692 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that general jurisdiction did not exist where the defendant occasionally sold products to entities in Texas that used the defendant's products for projects in Texas and the defendant's employees made field visits to Texas between December 1992 and December 1993
Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A.
791 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2015) Cited 230 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding the FDCPA applied to defendant's filing of a reply brief attempting to garnish plaintiff's wages for an unpaid automobile debt after knowing plaintiff was exempt
Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. A-C Co.
859 F.2d 1336 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 319 timesHolding that when the trust fund is the prevailing party, it is entitled to all the relief mandated under § 1132(g)
Bishop v. Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A.
817 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2016) Cited 142 timesIn Bishop, this Court analyzed Section 1692g, which imposes certain requirements for a debt collector's "initial communication" with a consumer.
Johnson v. Univ. of Rochester
642 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2011) Cited 124 timesRuling the court "lacks appellate jurisdiction" over an order denying Appellant's Rule 60(b) motion because he filed the original motion "three days after the twenty-eight day tolling deadline expired"
Carver v. Carver
954 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1992) Cited 204 timesHolding that the bankruptcy court should have abstained from hearing a debtor's claim for violation of the automatic stay where the debtor's ex-wife filed a state court claim for non-payment of child support obligations
Nisenbaum v. Milwaukee County
333 F.3d 804 (7th Cir. 2003) Cited 128 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that party's letter to opposing counsel constituted substantial compliance with Rule 11
Larez v. Holcomb
16 F.3d 1513 (9th Cir. 1994) Cited 115 timesHolding that appellate court order of new trial on damages warranted vacatur of attorney's fee award and reconsideration of the fee issue by the district court
F.T.C. v. Butterworth Health Corp.
121 F.3d 708 (6th Cir. 1997) Cited 66 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding in the face of continued litigation "technical non-compliance [with the safe harbor] did not prejudice plaintiffs."
Section 1692k - Civil liability
15 U.S.C. § 1692k Cited 6,102 times 65 Legal AnalysesHolding debt collectors civilly liable for illicit debt collection practices
Rule 9011 - Signing of Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions; Verification and Copies of Papers
Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011 Cited 2,468 times 9 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 11