24 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 195,191 times   262 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the sufficiency of the allegations is a legal question so appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider it on appeal from denial of qualified immunity
  2. Daimler AG v. Bauman

    571 U.S. 117 (2014)   Cited 3,752 times   191 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"
  3. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

    471 U.S. 462 (1985)   Cited 14,440 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
  4. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Oper. v. Brown

    564 U.S. 915 (2011)   Cited 3,547 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction
  5. Walden v. Fiore

    571 U.S. 277 (2014)   Cited 2,793 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "however significant the plaintiff's contacts with the forum may be, those contacts cannot be decisive in determining whether the defendant's due process rights are violated"
  6. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 19,913 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he activities which establish its `presence' subject it alike to taxation by the state and to suit to recover the tax"
  7. Swartz v. KPMG LLP

    476 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 2,408 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”
  8. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.

    374 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 1,999 times
    Holding that, in the tort context, "[t]he `express aiming' analysis depends, to a significant degree, on the specific type of tort or other wrongful conduct at issue"
  9. Boschetto v. Hansing

    539 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 856 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a single eBay sale to a California resident did not give rise to personal jurisdiction there
  10. Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy

    453 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 807 times
    Holding that a district court "need not permit even limited discovery" where a "plaintiff's claim of personal jurisdiction appears to be both attenuated and based on bare allegations in the face of specific denials made by the defendants"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 267,561 times   779 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 49,849 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  13. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 11,153 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the Rules of Civil Procedure "should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding."
  14. Section 410.10 - Generally

    Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 410.10   Cited 1,090 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing for jurisdiction over non-residents coextensive with due process requirements