15 Cited authorities

Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (1983) Cited 18,903 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
412 U.S. 218 (1973) Cited 11,951 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search
Katz v. United States
389 U.S. 347 (1967) Cited 12,442 times 74 Legal Analyses
Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"
Bumper v. North Carolina
391 U.S. 543 (1968) Cited 2,822 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority “cannot be consent”
Wilson v. Arkansas
514 U.S. 927 (1995) Cited 818 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "common-law 'knock and announce' principle forms a part of the reasonableness inquiry under the Fourth Amendment"
Draper v. United States
358 U.S. 307 (1959) Cited 2,689 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that hearsay may be considered in determining the existence of probable cause, even if it would not be admissible in a criminal trial
Arkansas v. Sanders
442 U.S. 753 (1979) Cited 1,063 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding as unreasonable a warrantless search of a suitcase carried by defendant at an airport and placed into the trunk of a taxi
Marron v. United States
275 U.S. 192 (1927) Cited 1,192 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 (1927), also cited by the majority, the Court upheld the seizure of business records as being incident to a valid arrest for operating an illegal retail whiskey enterprise.
U.S. v. Basinski
226 F.3d 829 (7th Cir. 2000) Cited 232 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the defendant's friend lacked apparent authority over a briefcase because the officers “knew that [the defendant] never gave [his friend] the combination to the lock”
U.S. v. Wardrick
350 F.3d 446 (4th Cir. 2003) Cited 64 times
Finding that "[t]he act of resisting arrest poses a threat of direct confrontation between a police officer and the subject of the arrest, creating the potential for serious physical injury to the officer and others"
Section 841 - Prohibited acts A
21 U.S.C. § 841 Cited 90,509 times 145 Legal Analyses
In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.
Section 846 - Attempt and conspiracy
21 U.S.C. § 846 Cited 43,755 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding each conspirator responsible for the quantity of drugs distributed by the conspiracy
Section 2 - Principals
18 U.S.C. § 2 Cited 23,678 times 57 Legal Analyses
Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law
Section 1957 - Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity
18 U.S.C. § 1957 Cited 3,237 times 41 Legal Analyses
Finding an error in the trial court's jury instructions harmless "[b]ecause overwhelming evidence support[ed] the jury's finding" of guilt

USA v. Ziscovici

15 Cited authorities

Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"

Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search

Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"

Holding that acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority “cannot be consent”

Holding that the "common-law 'knock and announce' principle forms a part of the reasonableness inquiry under the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that hearsay may be considered in determining the existence of probable cause, even if it would not be admissible in a criminal trial

Holding as unreasonable a warrantless search of a suitcase carried by defendant at an airport and placed into the trunk of a taxi

In Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192 (1927), also cited by the majority, the Court upheld the seizure of business records as being incident to a valid arrest for operating an illegal retail whiskey enterprise.

Holding that the defendant's friend lacked apparent authority over a briefcase because the officers “knew that [the defendant] never gave [his friend] the combination to the lock”

Finding that "[t]he act of resisting arrest poses a threat of direct confrontation between a police officer and the subject of the arrest, creating the potential for serious physical injury to the officer and others"

In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.

Holding each conspirator responsible for the quantity of drugs distributed by the conspiracy

Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

Finding an error in the trial court's jury instructions harmless "[b]ecause overwhelming evidence support[ed] the jury's finding" of guilt