U.S. v. A. Lanoy Alston, D.M.D., P.C
974 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 244 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming grant of new trial on this reasoning
Ghent v. Woodford
279 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 168 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that there was no inherent prejudice where “a few jurors at most glimpsed Ghent in shackles in the hallway and as he was entering the courtroom”
U.S. v. Kaplan
490 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2007) Cited 133 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that evidence of others' knowledge should only be admitted to indicate the knowledge of another if there is some other evidence in the record from which to conclude that the persons have the same knowledge
U.S. v. Seschillie
310 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 109 timesHolding that expert testimony is not required where the subject does not need expert "illumination" and the proponent is otherwise able to elicit testimony about the subject
U.S. v. Moran
482 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 63 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that we review the jury instructions "as a whole, and in context."
U.S. v. Tarallo
380 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 52 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that fraudulently intending to take someone's money is intent to harm
U.S. v. Aguilar
80 F.3d 329 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 20 times 1 Legal AnalysesStating that the district court is not necessarily required to define "knowledge" because it is a common word that an average juror can understand
In re Cloutier
33 B.R. 18 (Bankr. D. Me. 1983) Cited 15 timesFinding nondischargeable a debt resulting from driving while intoxicated because the substantial certainty of injury arising from the judgment-debtor's drinking gave rise to an inference of an intent to injure
Rule 701 - Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 701 Cited 5,700 times 26 Legal AnalysesRequiring lay opinion testimony to be "rationally based on the witness's perception"
Section 78ff - Penalties
15 U.S.C. § 78ff Cited 659 times 23 Legal AnalysesProviding criminal penalties