§Why CasetextPricing

USA v. Litvak

MOTION in Limine to Preclude Evidence or Argument Concerning Purported Selective Prosecution

9 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Moon

    718 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 272 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that refusal to grant defendant, the Reverend Sun Myung Moon, a bench trial was not error because defendant was adequately protected from juror prejudice by the jury selection process

  2. United States v. Coté

    544 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that factfinder can resolve conflicts in witnesses' testimony by rejecting extremes and concluding that truth lies "somewhere in between"

  3. United States v. Berrigan

    482 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 254 times
    Holding a defendant is entitled to a hearing when there is a "colorable basis" for the allegation

  4. United States v. Washington

    705 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 131 times
    Finding that defendant has right to be present for juror questioning

  5. United States v. Taylor

    562 F.2d 1345 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 148 times
    Holding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying severance, in part because the defendant had failed to establish, as Finkelstein require[d], that the codefendant would waive his Fifth Amendment privilege given the codefendant's repeated assertions that he would not answer any questions until instructed by the court that he had no Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer

  6. U.S. v. Regan

    103 F.3d 1072 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 82 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of misconduct made by certain witnesses were not offered for their truth, but simply as "background evidence" of the events that led to the investigation which resulted in defendant's arrest

  7. U.S. v. Jones

    52 F.3d 924 (11th Cir. 1995)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that an actual conflict of interest existed where raising a selective prosecution defense on behalf of one client "would have had the effect of pressuring the government to indict [the attorney's] other client"

  8. United States v. Napper

    553 F. Supp. 231 (E.D.N.Y. 1982)   Cited 7 times
    Ordering production of statistics, policies, and communications with foreign officials either to court or opposing party

  9. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 22,459 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks