Brice v. State Dept. of Correction
704 A.2d 1176 (Del. 1998) Cited 41 timesNoting that an equitable exception to the American Rule that each party is responsible for payment of its own attorney fees is when the losing party has acted in bad faith
Henne v. Balick
51 Del. 369 (Del. 1958) Cited 101 timesRecognizing that a witness's or counsel's suggestion regarding a reasonable award for pain and suffering is inappropriate
MBKS Company Ltd. v. Reddy
924 A.2d 965 (Del. Ch. 2007) Cited 12 timesFinding cancellation of stock appropriate and ordering the return of "all monies paid by [the stockholder] for th[e] shares"
Trueposition, Inc. v. Andrew Corporation
507 F. Supp. 2d 447 (D. Del. 2007) Cited 3 timesHolding expert could not rely on broad interpretation because he failed to include in his invalidity report how the defendant's equipment compares to either the claim limitations or the prior art
William H. Porter, Inc. v. Edwards
616 A.2d 838 (Del. 1992) Cited 5 timesExplaining that because the defendant failed to renew its earlier motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, it lacked standing to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons
Fed. R. Evid. 403 Cited 22,456 times 81 Legal AnalysesAdopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
Section 2533 - Remedies
Del. Code tit. 6 § 2533 Cited 42 times(a) A person likely to be damaged by a deceptive trade practice of another may be granted an injunction against it under the principles of equity and on terms that the court considers reasonable. Proof of monetary damage, loss of profits, or intent to deceive, is not required. Relief granted for the copying of an article shall be limited to the prevention of confusion or misunderstanding as to source. (b) The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorneys' fees to the prevailing party