Texas v. United States
523 U.S. 296 (1998) Cited 1,467 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim that "rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all" is not ripe for adjudication
Minnesota v. Public
483 F.3d 570 (8th Cir. 2007) Cited 33 times
Holding that a state regulator's challenge to an FCC order was not ripe because it involved only a prediction of what the FCC would do in the future
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 344,767 times 920 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss