3 Cited authorities

  1. Texas v. United States

    523 U.S. 296 (1998)   Cited 1,158 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim that "rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all" is not ripe for adjudication
  2. Minnesota v. Public

    483 F.3d 570 (8th Cir. 2007)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that a state regulator's challenge to an FCC order was not ripe because it involved only a prediction of what the FCC would do in the future
  3. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 270,437 times   785 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss