28 Cited authorities

  1. Nken v. Holder

    556 U.S. 418 (2009)   Cited 2,044 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "possibility" of success on the merits is never sufficient
  2. U.S. v. Hinkson

    585 F.3d 1247 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,405 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the abuse of discretion "test then requires us to determine whether the district court's findings of fact . . . were illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences that may be drawn from facts in the record."
  3. Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions

    353 F.3d 792 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 335 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena requesting “all documents” relating to certain people, products, and procedures imposed an undue burden
  4. Boyd v. City of San Francisco

    576 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that trial court's evidentiary decisions related to admissibility of expert testimony and character evidence were not an abuse of discretion, but admission of rap lyrics found in decedent's car to show animosity toward police was an abuse of discretion
  5. Openmind Solutions, Inc. v. Does 1-39

    No. C 11-3311 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)   Cited 120 times
    Concluding that plaintiff satisfied the first factor by identifying the defendants' IP addresses and by tracing the IP addresses to a point of origin within the State of California
  6. Payne v. Exxon Corp.

    121 F.3d 503 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 152 times
    Holding defendant lacked standing to compel a response to codefendant's discovery request
  7. Perlman v. United States

    247 U.S. 7 (1918)   Cited 344 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discovery orders directed at third parties are immediately appealable
  8. Speiser, Krause Madole P.C. v. Ortiz

    271 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that failure of a litigant to property read or understand the applicable rule does not constitute excusable neglect
  9. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-5

    818 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2011)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that " Doe defendant lacks standing to quash a subpoena on the ground of undue burden when the subpoena is directed to the ISP rather than to him" because the subpoena requires the ISP, and not the Doe Defendant, to produce information
  10. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

    656 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that "[o]n the basis of the clear language of Rule 45, we must hold that the court that issued the subpoena, and not the court where the underlying action is pending, can entertain a motion to quash or modify a subpoena."
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 71,273 times   538 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 31,885 times   261 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a party who alleged fraud or mistake to "state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud of mistake"
  13. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 12,168 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"
  14. Section 551 - Protection of subscriber privacy

    47 U.S.C. § 551   Cited 662 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting disclosure of "personally identifiable information" concerning cable subscriber without consent
  15. Section 2702 - Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2702   Cited 296 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Restricting use of Internet subscriber information without consent