§Why CasetextPricing

Turnkey Solutions Corporation v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Second MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's Second Motion For Partial Summary Judgment [Re

23 Cited authorities

  1. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    144 F.3d 664 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5,045 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that arguments inadequately presented in the opening brief are waived

  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.

    467 U.S. 986 (1984)   Cited 1,061 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Missouri law, which follows the Restatement of Torts, creates cognizable property right in trade secrets

  3. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court

    51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,557 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"

  4. Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.

    9 F.3d 823 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 316 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding trade secret misappropriation not preempted in case in which some of the defendants—former employees—had been in a confidential relationship, but at least one defendant—the corporation for which the other defendants now worked—had not

  5. Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.

    184 Cal.App.4th 210 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 187 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[i]t is critical to [a misappropriation of trade secrets] cause of action - and any defense - that the information claimed to have been misappropriated be clearly identified"

  6. IDX Systems Corp. v. Epic Systems Corp.

    285 F.3d 581 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 137 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the appearance of data entry screens" are not trade secrets

  7. Hertz v. Luzenac Grp.

    576 F.3d 1103 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 110 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a customer list may be a trade secret where "it is the end result of a long process of culling the relevant information from lengthy and diverse sources, even if the original sources are publicly available"

  8. Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.

    819 F. Supp. 2d 1001 (E.D. Cal. 2011)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff "must clearly identify what the 'thing' is that is alleged to be a trade secret" and "clearly articulate why that 'thing' belongs in the legal category of trade secret"

  9. Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.

    923 F. Supp. 1231 (N.D. Cal. 1995)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[r]easonable efforts can include advising employees of the existence of a trade secret, limiting access to information on a 'need to know basis,' requiring employees to sign confidentiality agreements, and keeping secret documents under lock"

  10. Colorado Supply Co., Inc. v. Stewart

    797 P.2d 1303 (Colo. App. 1990)   Cited 60 times
    Finding that customer and pricing lists were not trade secrets because they were easily obtainable via public sources of information

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,019 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,437 times   648 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  13. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,561 times   251 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard

  14. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 10,861 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)

  15. Section 7-74-101 - Short title

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 7-74-101   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Trade Secrets Act". C.R.S. § 7-74-101 L. 86: Entire article added, p. 460, § 1, effective July 1.

  16. Section 7-74-102 - Definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 7-74-102   Cited 98 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining “[m]isappropriation

  17. Section 7-74-109 - Uniformity of application and construction

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 7-74-109   Cited 2 times

    This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among states enacting it. C.R.S. § 7-74-109 L. 86: Entire article added, p. 462, § 1, effective July 1.