§Why CasetextPricing

Turnbow et al v. Life Partners Inc et al

RESPONSE

27 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 27,127 times   238 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

  2. In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation

    35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 2,160 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding an expert's testimony unreliable because he did not consider alternative causes

  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 1,305 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that expert testimony was inadmissible based on its unreliable methodology notwithstanding "the impressive qualifications of plaintiffs' experts"

  4. Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc.

    288 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 926 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jury was entitled to hear expert testimony and decide whether to accept or reject it after considering whether predicate facts on which expert relied were accurate

  5. In re Scrap Metal

    527 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 681 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert factors "are not dispositive in every case and should be applied only where they are reasonable measures of the reliability of expert testimony."

  6. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.

    215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 710 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the district court must consider whether the testimony will assist the trier of fact with its analysis of any of the issues involved in the case"

  7. U.S. v. 14.38 Acres of Land, Sit. in Leflore

    80 F.3d 1074 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 788 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that increased fear of flooding was a matter that factfinder could properly consider in assessing severance damages

  8. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.

    327 U.S. 251 (1946)   Cited 987 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"

  9. ERI Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Swinnea

    318 S.W.3d 867 (Tex. 2010)   Cited 347 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a long-time owner of a company was competent to testify regarding its profit margin

  10. Viterbo v. Dow Chemical Co.

    826 F.2d 420 (5th Cir. 1987)   Cited 686 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that expert report was properly excluded by district court because it was based primarily on statements by plaintiff that defendant's product was only possible source of plaintiff's injuries

  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 27,667 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard