§Why CasetextPricing

Turnbow et al v. Life Partners Inc et al

REPLY

17 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 251,437 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,719 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.

    567 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 2,246 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that circumstances constituting fraud must be stated with particularity

  4. Brown v. Matauszak

    415 F. App'x 608 (6th Cir. 2011)   Cited 1,537 times
    Holding that Plaintiff must set forth specific, well-pleaded facts, not just conclusory allegations

  5. Maya v. Centex Corp..

    658 F.3d 1060 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 775 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that homeowners in a housing development had suffered an injury-in-fact from homebuilders’ alleged failure to disclose that they were advertising to unqualified buyers because "plaintiffs spent money that, absent defendants’ actions, they would not have spent"

  6. Birdsong v. Apple

    590 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 316 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that hypothetical injury was insufficient for standing

  7. Little v. Llp

    575 F.3d 533 (5th Cir. 2009)   Cited 92 times
    Affirming dismissal for lack of standing under Rule 12(b)

  8. Methodist Hosp v. Corporate Comm Inc.

    806 S.W.2d 879 (Tex. App. 1991)   Cited 59 times

    No. 05-90-00388-CV. March 6, 1991. Rehearing Denied April 24, 1991. Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, John M. Marshall, J. B. Scott Tilley, Wade L. McClure, Dallas, for appellant. Anthony A. Petrocchi, Christopher M. Weil, Dallas, for appellee. Before WHITHAM, LAGARDE and KINKEADE, JJ. OPINION KINKEADE, Justice. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas appeals a judgment in favor of Corporate Communicators, Inc. (CCI) in this breach of contract action. In eleven points of error, Methodist

  9. OXY USA, Inc. v. Cook

    127 S.W.3d 16 (Tex. App. 2003)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12-02-00027-CV. Opinion delivered June 30, 2003. Rehearing Overruled August 4, 2003. Appeal from the Fourth Appellant Judicial District Court of Rusk County, Texas, J. Clay Gossett, J. Reversed and rendered. J. Don Westbrook, Coghlan, Crowson, Fitzpatrick Westbrook, L.L.P., Longview, for appellant. Ron Adkinson, Wellborn, Houston, Adkison, Mann, Sadler Hill, L.L.P., Henderson, for appellee. Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J. and RAMEY, JR., Chief Justice retired, Twelfth Court of

  10. Coffey v. Fort Wayne Pools, Inc.

    24 F. Supp. 2d 671 (N.D. Tex. 1998)   Cited 33 times
    Holding a principal does not exercise control sufficient to create an agency relationship merely by limiting which products a particular contractor could install

  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,790 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices