13 Cited authorities

Hishon v. King Spalding
467 U.S. 69 (1984) Cited 12,420 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding Title VII applies to selection for non-employee positions if consideration for that position can be regarded as one of "terms, conditions, or privileges of employment" of a covered job
Morse v. Lower Merion School District
132 F.3d 902 (3d Cir. 1997) Cited 6,167 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that because "the notion of deliberate indifference contemplates a danger that must at least be foreseeable," defendant cannot be said to have ignored a foreseeable risk or danger if plaintiff has not shown the existence of such a risk
Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody Co., Inc.
260 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2001) Cited 180 times
Holding that inquiry notice exists where "a reasonable investor of ordinary intelligence would have discovered the [suspicious] information and recognized it" as suspicious
In re Alpharma Inc. Securities Litigation
372 F.3d 137 (3d Cir. 2004) Cited 157 times
Holding that allegations that an executive's subordinate knew of corporate misconduct was "an insufficient basis upon which to impute knowledge" to the executive
In re Exxon Mobil Corp.
500 F.3d 189 (3d Cir. 2007) Cited 76 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding "that the repose period applicable to § 10(b) claims as set out in ... 1658(b) begins to run on the date of the alleged misrepresentation."
In re Exxon Mobil Corp. Securities Litigation
387 F. Supp. 2d 407 (D.N.J. 2005) Cited 30 times
Civil Action No. 04-1257 (FLW). September 14, 2005. Daniel B. Allanoff, Meredith, Cohen, Greenfogel Skirnick, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Paul F. Carvelli, McCusker, Anselmi, Rosen, Carvelli Walsh, PA, Chatham, NJ, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, which alleges violations of (i) Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C
Appel v. Kidder, Peabody Co. Inc.
628 F. Supp. 153 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) Cited 35 times
Finding locus of harm to be state where beneficiaries of allegedly churned trust account resided rather than in state where corpus of trust was located and securities transactions occurred
Saxton v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund
Civil Action No. 02-CV-986 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 9, 2003) Cited 12 times
In Saxton, another of plaintiffs' claims was that defendants violated their fiduciary duties under ERISA by adopting amendments that severely reduced plaintiffs' accrued benefits and the accrual of future benefits.
Komanoff v. Mabon, Nugent Co.
884 F. Supp. 848 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) Cited 16 times
Declining to apply doctrine of fraudulent concealment after the Supreme Court's decision in Lampf
Goodman v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.
698 F. Supp. 1078 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) Cited 17 times
Holding that the plaintiff could not maintain controlling person liability against individuals after the court had dismissed the claims against the controlled company
Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 Cited 38,830 times 316 Legal Analyses
Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation
15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 Cited 7,441 times 48 Legal Analyses
Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

Travis v. the Vanguard Group, Inc. et al

13 Cited authorities

Holding Title VII applies to selection for non-employee positions if consideration for that position can be regarded as one of "terms, conditions, or privileges of employment" of a covered job

Holding that because "the notion of deliberate indifference contemplates a danger that must at least be foreseeable," defendant cannot be said to have ignored a foreseeable risk or danger if plaintiff has not shown the existence of such a risk

Holding that inquiry notice exists where "a reasonable investor of ordinary intelligence would have discovered the [suspicious] information and recognized it" as suspicious

Holding that allegations that an executive's subordinate knew of corporate misconduct was "an insufficient basis upon which to impute knowledge" to the executive

Holding "that the repose period applicable to § 10(b) claims as set out in ... 1658(b) begins to run on the date of the alleged misrepresentation."

Finding locus of harm to be state where beneficiaries of allegedly churned trust account resided rather than in state where corpus of trust was located and securities transactions occurred

In Saxton, another of plaintiffs' claims was that defendants violated their fiduciary duties under ERISA by adopting amendments that severely reduced plaintiffs' accrued benefits and the accrual of future benefits.

Declining to apply doctrine of fraudulent concealment after the Supreme Court's decision in Lampf

Holding that the plaintiff could not maintain controlling person liability against individuals after the court had dismissed the claims against the controlled company

Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"

Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party