40 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 234,950 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    144 F.3d 664 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5,022 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that arguments inadequately presented in the opening brief are waived
  3. Bones v. Honeywell Intern., Inc.

    366 F.3d 869 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 1,208 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff waived a challenge to the district court's alternative ground by challenging only the court's first ground for the ruling
  4. Scott v. Hern

    216 F.3d 897 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 368 times
    Holding a county attorney had absolute immunity from a § 1983 claim arising out of a civil commitment proceeding
  5. Carney v. Denver

    534 F.3d 1269 (10th Cir. 2008)   Cited 278 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a municipality may be held liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under Section 1983, if the plaintiff can show that the alleged conduct was the result of a municipal policy or custom
  6. Harris Group v. Robinson

    209 P.3d 1188 (Colo. App. 2009)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that unjust enrichment is an equitable remedy that is not available where there is “a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law”
  7. Nelson v. Elway

    908 P.2d 102 (Colo. 1995)   Cited 136 times
    Holding that "merger clauses preclude consideration of extrinsic evidence to ascertain the intent of the parties"
  8. Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter Burgess

    229 P.3d 282 (Colo. App. 2009)   Cited 82 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claims of fraud relating to the performance of a contract are barred by the economic loss rule
  9. Double Oak v. Cornerstone Devel

    97 P.3d 140 (Colo. App. 2004)   Cited 89 times
    Recognizing that the majority of jurisdictions do not allow claims for conspiracy to effect fraudulent conveyance, but choosing to follow the minority approach
  10. Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Gutierrez

    544 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (D. Colo. 2008)   Cited 75 times
    Finding allegations sufficient to establish violations of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 where plaintiff alleged that defendants were not authorized to broadcast the program in their restaurant, the broadcast could only have been accomplished through illegal means, and the services intercepted or received were also distributed via cable
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 326,905 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 18-4-401 - Theft

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-401   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Giving municipalities "concurrent power to prohibit theft, by ordinance, where the value of the thing involved is less than one thousand dollars."
  13. Section 18-4-405 - Rights in stolen property

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-405   Cited 177 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing in a case of civil theft that "the owner may recover two hundred dollars or three times the amount of the actual damages sustained by him, whichever is greater"
  14. Section 4-2-403 - Power to transfer - good faith purchase of goods - "entrusting"

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-2-403   Cited 7 times

    (1) A purchaser of goods acquires all title which his transferor had or had power to transfer; except, that a purchaser of a limited interest acquires rights only to the extent of the interest purchased. A person with voidable title has power to transfer a good title to a good faith purchaser for value. When goods have been delivered under a transaction of purchase, the purchaser has such power even though: (a) The transferor was deceived as to the identity of the purchaser, or (b) The delivery was

  15. Section 42-9-101 - Short title

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-9-101   Cited 5 times

    This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Motor Vehicle Repair Act of 1977". C.R.S. § 42-9-101 L. 94: Entire title amended with relocations, p. 2500, § 1, effective January 1, 1995. This section is similar to former § 42-11-101 as it existed prior to 1994.

  16. Section 42-9-104 - When consent and estimate required - original transaction - disassembly

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-9-104

    (1) (a) No repairs on a motor vehicle shall be performed by a motor vehicle repair facility unless the facility obtains the written consent of the customer. (b) The required written consent is waived by the customer only when the motor vehicle has been towed to the motor vehicle repair facility or the customer has left the motor vehicle with the motor vehicle repair facility outside of normal business hours or when the customer has signed a waiver in compliance with paragraph (b) of subsection (2)