9 Cited authorities

  1. McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

    501 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 412 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a direct infringement claim made in accordance with Form 16 (now Form 18) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure meets the Twombly pleading standard
  2. ACCO Brands, Inc. v. ABA Locks Mfr. Co.

    501 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 237 times
    Holding that the patent owner must show actual infringement, rather than just the capability to infringe
  3. Golden Blount, Inc. v. Robert H. Peterson

    365 F.3d 1054 (Fed. Cir. 2004)   Cited 114 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of persuasion is on the plaintiff
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc.

    363 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2004)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a particulate dispersion inside the body cannot infringe under the doctrine of equivalents because it would vitiate the claimed requirement that the dispersion be prepared outside the body
  5. Colida v. Nokia

    347 F. App'x 568 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 37 times
    Finding district court properly granted Nokia's motion to dismiss where Colida's infringement claims were facially implausible and provided the district court with no basis upon which to reasonably infer the ordinary observer would confuse plaintiff's patent design with Nokia's phone where the dissimilarities between the two far exceed the similarities
  6. Elan Microelectronics Corp. v. Apple, Inc.

    No. C 09-01531 RS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2009)   Cited 22 times
    Holding on a motion to dismiss that it is insufficient to generally allege that "there may or may not be infringement, we need further discovery to find out" or that a party "believes there is infringement and is making that factual contention, but needs discovery to gather evidentiary support for the contention"
  7. Clear with Computers, LLC v. Bergdorf Goodman, Inc.

    CASE NO. 6:09CV481 PATENT CASE (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2011)

    CASE NO. 6:09CV481 PATENT CASE. January 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge This opinion construes terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,615,342. BACKGROUND Clear with Computers, LLC ("CWC") asserts the `342 patent in both CWC v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., Case No. 6:09cv95, and CWC v. Hyundai Construction Equipment, Inc., Case No. 6:09cv139. Identical terms are at issue in both cases, and the parties' propose nearly identical constructions in both cases. Those cases have been

  8. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 356,694 times   945 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  9. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 161,416 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."