All State & Fed.
The Nick Vertucci Companies, Inc., et al. v. Parr
Response in Opposition to Motion
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sonia Invs.
237 F.R.D. 395 (N.D. Tex. 2006)
Cited 81 times
1 Legal Analyses
Holding that motion to compel must be filed before close of discovery
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA
190 F.R.D. 556 (S.D. Cal. 1999)
Cited 93 times
Finding no distinction between a discovery deposition and trial deposition
Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 19, 2014)
Cited 8 times
Finding nine-day response time unreasonable
Curry v. Strain
262 F. App'x 650 (5th Cir. 2008)
Cited 6 times
Finding no abuse of discretion where the district court dismissed a motion to compel in part because it was filed almost one month after the discovery deadline
Rule 45 - Subpoena
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45
Cited 12,320 times
72 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"