5 Cited authorities

  1. Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sonia Invs.

    237 F.R.D. 395 (N.D. Tex. 2006)   Cited 81 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that motion to compel must be filed before close of discovery
  2. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA

    190 F.R.D. 556 (S.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 93 times
    Finding no distinction between a discovery deposition and trial deposition
  3. Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 19, 2014)   Cited 8 times
    Finding nine-day response time unreasonable
  4. Curry v. Strain

    262 F. App'x 650 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 6 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion where the district court dismissed a motion to compel in part because it was filed almost one month after the discovery deadline
  5. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 12,320 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"