§Why CasetextPricing

Sussex et al v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC et al

MOTION For Reconsideration of Motion to Relate Cases And Request for Priority Hearing

6 Cited authorities

  1. School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.

    5 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 4,763 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "overwhelming weight of authority is that the failure to file documents in an original motion or opposition does not turn the late filed documents into 'newly discovered evidence'" for a motion for reconsideration

  2. Linq360, LLC v. Suite Linq, Inc.

    2:12-CV-01881-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. Jul. 22, 2013)

    2:12-CV-01881-LRH-CWH 2:12-CV-01882-LRH-CWH 07-22-2013 LINQ360, LLC Plaintiff, v. SUITE LINQ, INC., Defendant. LARRY R. HICKS ORDER This is a contract dispute. Before the Court are Defendant SuiteLinq, Inc.'s ("SuiteLinq") (1) Motions to Dismiss and Quash Service (Docs. #6-1881 , #7-1882); and (2) Motion to Consolidate (Doc. #15-1881). Plaintiff Linq360, LLC ("Linq360") has responded (Docs. #10-1881, #11-1882), and SuiteLinq has replied (Docs. #11-1881, #12-1882). Also before the Court is Linq360's

  3. Alutiiq Int'l Solutions, LLC v. Lyon

    Case No.: 2:11-cv-01104-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 22, 2013)

    Case No.: 2:11-cv-01104-GMN-PAL 03-22-2013 ALUTIIQ INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS LYON; RUTH CHAVEZ LYON; MELISSA SAN MARTIN; NATIVE AMERICAN FUNDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES; and OCEANIA INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendants. Gloria M. Navarro ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC's ("Alutiiq") Refiled Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (ECF No. 54), and the Motion to Set Aside Default (ECF No. 55) filed by Defendants Native American Funds Management

  4. Waterfall Homeowners Ass'n v. Viega, Inc.

    2:11-cv-01498-JCM -VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 18, 2012)

    2:11-cv-01498-JCM -VCF 01-18-2012 WATERFALL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VIEGA, INC, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the court are defendants Viego, Inc., et al's notices of related cases. (Docs #44 and #45). Background The plaintiffs' complaint stems from alleged damages caused by "potable-water-delivery systems [that] utiliz[e] defective high zinc brass Vanguard Viega-brand or Wirsbo Uponor-brand fittings and . . . high zinc content brass plumbing components." (Doc #1). Prior

  5. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,067 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

  6. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 21,910 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system