MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion in Limine, 58 Reply to opposition to Motion, 54 Memorandum in Opposition, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Holding that the district court properly denied the plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion regarding an order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss as conceded, as the plaintiff's complaint and proposed opposition were insufficient as a matter of law to defeat the motion
Concluding that there was no basis for a finding of fraud on the court where representatives of a corporate party perjured themselves and the party's attorney misled the court
Applying New York law, court's inquiry was "whether there had been a knowing discharge of toxic or hazardous wastes," rather than "a discharge of known toxic or hazardous wastes."