Board of Regents v. Roth

Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."

Elrod v. Burns

Holding that local government could not constitutionally base public employment opportunities on political affiliation or nonaffiliation

Chicago v. Morales

Holding that vagueness that "fails to establish standards for the police and public that are sufficient to guard against the arbitrary deprivation of liberty interests" is subject to facial challenge

Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Holding that rules that distinguish "based only upon the manner in which speakers transmit their messages to viewers, and not upon the messages they carry" are content-neutral

Weinberger v. Salfi

Holding existence of a final decision made after a hearing is central to the grant of subject matter jurisdiction under § 405(g)

Houston v. Hill

Holding that the First Amendment does not permit states to “provide the police with unfettered discretion to arrest individuals for words or conduct that annoy or offend them”

Griffin v. United States

Holding that a general guilty verdict on a multiple-object conspiracy need not be set aside if the evidence is adequate to support conviction as to one of the objects

California Transport v. Trucking Unlimited

Holding "the right to petition extends to all departments of the Government," including the courts

Parker v. Levy

Holding that "[o]ne to whose conduct a statute clearly applies may not successfully challenge it for vagueness"

City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.

Holding that "'[t]he First Amendment does not require a city, before enacting . . . an [adult entertainment secondary effects] ordinance to conduct new studies or produce evidence independent of that already generated by other cities, so long as whatever evidence the city relies upon is reasonably believed to be relevant to the problem that the city addresses.'"

Section 934 - Art. 134. General article

Prohibiting conduct which is of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, or conduct which is prejudicial to good order and discipline

Section 890 - Art. 90. Willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer

Section 3.12 - Character of discharge

Providing that benefits are "not payable unless the period of service on which the claim is based was terminated by discharge or release under conditions other than dishonorable"