§Why CasetextPricing

Sorensen v. Digital Networks North America, Inc.

Reply to Opposition re MOTION to Stay Notice of Motion to Stay the Litigation Pending the Outcome of Reexamination Proceedings Defendant Digital Networks North America's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposing Brief to Defendant's Motion for Stay

4 Cited authorities

  1. Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc.

    450 F. Supp. 2d 1107 (N.D. Cal. 2006)   Cited 114 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that four requests for reexamination that were missing necessary elements suggested movant was taking tactical advantage of opportunities for delay

  2. E.E.O.C. v. Gear Petroleum, Inc.

    948 F.2d 1542 (10th Cir. 1991)   Cited 34 times
    Excluding impeachment evidence under Rule 408

  3. Rule 18 - Joinder of Claims

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 18   Cited 5,394 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a party may join multiple "claims" against a single defendant

  4. Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations

    Fed. R. Evid. 408   Cited 4,248 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)