32 Cited authorities

  1. Robbins v. Oklahoma

    519 F.3d 1242 (10th Cir. 2008)   Cited 6,012 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective allegations do not satisfy a plaintiff's "burden . . . to provide fair notice of the grounds for the claims made against each of the defendants"
  2. Collyer v. Darling

    98 F.3d 211 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 958 times
    Holding that state action in mandamus compelling payment of two years of back pay was an adequate remedy at law
  3. Pace v. Swerdlow

    519 F.3d 1067 (10th Cir. 2008)   Cited 282 times
    Holding that it was proper for the district court to consider, on a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), exhibits attached to the Complaint, materials referenced in the Complaint, and all materials in the state court's file
  4. Sigmon v. CommunityCare HMO, Inc.

    234 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 240 times
    Finding that a private drug treatment program hired by the city of Tulsa was not a state actor
  5. Collyer v. Darling

    520 U.S. 1267 (1997)   Cited 83 times
    Noting that, in extending absolute immunity to those within administrative agencies who perform functions similar to judges and prosecutors, the Supreme Court has recognized that administrative proceedings are usually adversarial in nature and provide many of the same features and safeguards that are provided in court.
  6. Anaya v. Crossroads Managed Care Sys., Inc.

    195 F.3d 584 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 164 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a private defendant's creation of an advisory board of mostly state actors in order to increase illegal seizures for the defendant's financial gain "clearly establishes that [the defendant] acted in concert with state officials"
  7. Eddy v. Brown

    1986 OK 3 (Okla. 1986)   Cited 170 times
    Holding that nature of the conduct should not be considered in a sterile setting, detached from the milieu in which it took place
  8. Breeden v. League Services Corp.

    1978 OK 27 (Okla. 1978)   Cited 194 times
    Adopting the standards of Restatement of Torus (Second) § 46
  9. Douglas v. Cox Ret. Props., Inc.

    302 P.3d 789 (Okla. 2013)   Cited 52 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Comprehensive Law Suit Reform Act of 2009, including the 2009 version of section 2004, violates the "single subject rule" and is unconstitutional
  10. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.

    2006 OK 98 (Okla. 2007)   Cited 56 times
    Declaring 63 O.S.Supp.2003 § 1-1708.1E —which required plaintiffs in medical malpractice tort suits to consult with, and to obtain a written opinion from, a qualified expert in support of their claim prior to filing their lawsuits—was an unconstitutional special law and monetary barrier to court access
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 502,603 times   706 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 358,800 times   954 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  13. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 162,588 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  14. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 114,964 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  15. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 100,267 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  16. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 64,402 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
  17. Section 1985 - Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1985   Cited 20,333 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Concerning conspiracies to obstruct justice or intimidate a party, witness, or juror
  18. Section 1343 - Civil rights and elective franchise

    28 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 13,991 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts jurisdiction over "any civil action authorized by law"
  19. Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

    15 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 3,215 times   76 Legal Analyses
    Forbidding every "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States"
  20. Section 2011 - [Repealed]

    Okla. Stat. tit. 59 § 2011   Cited 17 times

    Okla. Stat. tit. 59, § 2011 Added by Laws 1988, HB 1630, c. 215, § 10, eff. 11/1/1988; Amended by Laws 1997, HB 1846, c. 267, § 1, eff. 9/1/1997; Repealed by Laws 2010 , HB 2831, c. 415, §39, emerg. eff. 7/1/2010.