Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar

Holding that application of the " ‘because’ of" requirement of Title VII's antiretaliation provision requires proof of "but-for" causation

New Hampshire v. Maine

Holding that under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “New Hampshire is equitably barred from asserting—contrary to its position in the 1970's litigation—that the inland Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore”

White v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

Holding the bankruptcy court adopted plaintiff's contrary position when it confirmed plaintiff's Chapter 13 plan, the final disposition of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case

Eastman v. Un. Pacific

Holding that debtor's assertion that he had told his attorney about claims and that his attorney "blew it" was "insufficient to withstand application of judicial estoppel

Jackman v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Dep't of Corr. Servs.

Holding that "the length of [plaintiff's] performance log and the number of coaching and counseling sessions she has endured" were not, in and of themselves, materially adverse employment actions

Clegg v. Ark. Dept

Holding that USERRA is violated where a member of the armed services is “not reemployed in the position she would have been in had she not taken military leave or a position of like seniority, status and pay”

Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Holding that after a defendant establishes the debtor's motive to conceal, “it [falls to the debtor] to show that the omission of his claims from his schedule of assets was inadvertent”

Duncan v. General Motors Corp.

Holding no actionable hostile work environment where co-employee asked plaintiff if she would have a relationship with him, touched the plaintiff's hand on four to five occasions, requested the plaintiff sketch a sexually objectionable planter, asked plaintiff to complete a task on his computer where its screen saver depicted a naked woman, hung an offensive poster, and asked plaintiff to type a document for him containing sexually offensive items

Robinson v. Tyson Foods

Holding that under binding precedent of this circuit, the Chapter 13 debtor "had a statutory duty to amend her schedule of assets to reflect her claims against" a defendant in a later civil suit where those claims arose after confirmation of her plan

Reich v. John Alden Life Ins. Co.

Holding that "representing the company" qualified as administrative work

Section 207 - Maximum hours

Establishing overtime rules

Section 16-123-101 - Title

Section 541.200 - General rule for administrative employees

Providing that the administrative exemption can also apply if the employee’s primary duty is directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer’s customers

Section 541.202 - Discretion and independent judgment

Regarding review by supervisors

Section 541.203 - Administrative exemption examples

Describing “[a]n employee who leads a team of other employees assigned to complete major projects for the employer” and “[a]n executive assistant or administrative assistant”

Section 541.704 - Use of manuals

Noting "employees who simply apply well-established techniques or procedures described in manuals or other sources within closely prescribed limits to determine the correct response to an inquiry or set of circumstances" are not exempt