§Why CasetextPricing

Sellers Capital, LLC et al v. Wight et al

REPLY

8 Cited authorities

  1. Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.

    312 U.S. 287 (1941)   Cited 381 times
    Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"

  2. Marseilles Hydro Power, LLC v. Marseilles Land & Water Co.

    299 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that specific performance is an equitable remedy

  3. George A. Fuller v. Chicago Col. of Ost. Med

    719 F.2d 1326 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 112 times
    Affirming dismissal of complaint for failure to state a cause of action for tortious interference with contract because no resulting breach was alleged

  4. Colton v. Swain

    527 F.2d 296 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 59 times
    Applying Illinois law; insurer's duty to defend "arose with the filing ... of a complaint which stated allegations sufficient to notify the company that the tort complained of was potentially within the coverage of its policy"

  5. Herman v. Prudence Mutual Cas. Co.

    41 Ill. 2d 468 (Ill. 1969)   Cited 55 times
    In Herman, the circuit court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action for malicious interference with contractual rights.

  6. Meadowmoor Dairies v. Drivers' Union

    371 Ill. 377 (Ill. 1939)   Cited 60 times
    In Milk Wagon Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Dairies, ante, p. 287, we held that acts of picketing when blended with violence may have a significance which neutralizes the constitutional immunity which such acts would have in isolation.

  7. Loewenthal Secur. Co. v. White Pav. Co.

    351 Ill. 285 (Ill. 1932)   Cited 31 times

    No. 20807. Decree and judgment reversed. Opinion filed December 23, 1932 Rehearing denied February 22, 1933. WRIT OF ERROR to the Second Division of the Appellate Court for the First District; — heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. OSCAR HEBEL, Judge, presiding. GEORGE F. BARRETT, CHARLES V. BARRETT, WILLIAM C. WERMUTH, and COOKE, SULLIVAN RICKS, (SCHUYLER, DUNBAR WEINFELD, GEORGE A. COOKE, EDWARD H. FIEDLER, and PHILIP A. GIBBONS, of counsel,) for plaintiffs

  8. Rule 14 - Third-Party Practice

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 14   Cited 3,622 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Striking improper third-party claim is appropriate remedy