Holding that a bank was not an initial transferee because it held funds “only for the purpose of fulfilling an instruction to make the funds available to someone else”
Holding that early redemption payments of commercial paper are “settlement payments” within the meaning of § 741 and thus protected by the safe harbor provision of § 546(e) and that nothing in the text of § 741 or the Bankruptcy Code support a purchase or sale requirement
745 F. Supp. 2d 386 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) Cited 77 times
Holding that where a defendant “was under a duty to update or correct [a prior misrepresentation] ... Plaintiffs are entitled to the Affiliated Ute presumption of reliance on this omission”
284 B.R. 355 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2002) Cited 92 times
Holding that the committee's allegations regarding the control exercised by a corporate parent that advised the debtor on corporate acquisitions over the decision by a corporate affiliate to finance such acquisitions were insufficient to hold the corporate affiliate liable for the parent's alleged misconduct, and thus to equitably subordinate affiliate's claim on that basis
Finding that section 546(e) “precludes the Trustee from bringing any action to recover from any of Madoff's customers any of the monies paid by Madoff Securities to those customers except in the case of actual fraud”
Holding that decision on motion to dismiss complaint for failure to state claim, being interlocutory in nature, did not implicate limitations imposed by Stern on bankruptcy court's authority to finally decide certain controversies; due to procedural character, any judicial determination of such motion at trial court level does not involve any factual findings and is always subject to de novo standard of appellate review