8 Cited authorities

  1. Dunleavy v. Nadler

    213 F.3d 454 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 862 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding an incentive award to the class representatives
  2. Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Guardian Glass Co.

    409 U.S. 1039 (1972)   Cited 222 times
    Construing TMT Trailer Ferry in context of settlement of derivative suit
  3. Weinberger v. Kendrick

    698 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 486 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "clearer showing of a settlement's fairness, reasonableness and adequacy" is required for a settlement reached "prior to class certification," though "we have long recognized that a district court's disposition of a proposed class action settlement should be accorded considerable deference"
  4. Newman v. Stein

    464 F.2d 689 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 345 times
    Articulating abuse-of-discretion and range-of-reasonableness standards for review of a bankruptcy court's approval of a settlement
  5. Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. Northeast Utilities

    332 F. Supp. 2d 639 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 31 times
    In Consol. Edison, Inc. v. Northeast Utilities, 332 F.Supp.2d 639 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), the Court, applying New York law, similarly granted a motion for summary judgment dismissing the defense of release.
  6. Teachers’ Ret. Sys. of Louisiana v. A.C.L.N., Ltd.

    Master File No. 01-CV-11814(MP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2004)   Cited 28 times
    Noting that the skill and prior experience of counsel in the specialized field of shareholder securities litigation is relevant in determining fair compensation
  7. In re Union Carbide Corp. Sec. Litig.

    718 F. Supp. 1099 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)   Cited 17 times
    Acknowledging that "a settlement can be approved even though the benefits amount to a small percentage of the recovery sought" and that the "essence of settlement is compromise."
  8. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,829 times   1232 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"