Josephs v. Pac. Bell
443 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 299 timesHolding that the district court did not err in admitting comparative evidence regarding three similarly situated employees
Hudspeth v. C.I.R
914 F.2d 1207 (9th Cir. 1990) Cited 58 timesHolding that failure to identify ground of admissibility limited appellate review to plain error
Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons
Fed. R. Evid. 403 Cited 22,449 times 81 Legal AnalysesAdopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 401 Cited 13,344 times 34 Legal AnalysesProviding that evidence is relevant if " it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action"
Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 402 Cited 6,625 times 10 Legal AnalysesProviding relevant evidence is admissible unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court
Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations
Fed. R. Evid. 408 Cited 4,246 times 43 Legal AnalysesHolding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)