6 Cited authorities

  1. Josephs v. Pac. Bell

    443 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 265 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not err in admitting comparative evidence regarding three similarly situated employees
  2. Hudspeth v. C.I.R

    914 F.2d 1207 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that failure to identify ground of admissibility limited appellate review to plain error
  3. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 18,912 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
  4. Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 401   Cited 10,996 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Defining evidence as relevant if "it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and the fact is of consequence in determining the action"
  5. Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 402   Cited 5,222 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Observing "irrelevant evidence is not admissible"
  6. Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations

    Fed. R. Evid. 408   Cited 3,432 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)