All State & Fed.
Sanchez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
MOTION in Limine re: to Preclude Evidence of Offers of Compromise
Josephs v. Pac. Bell
443 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2005)
Cited 254 times
1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court did not err in admitting comparative evidence regarding three similarly situated employees
Hudspeth v. C.I.R
914 F.2d 1207 (9th Cir. 1990)
Cited 50 times
Holding that failure to identify ground of admissibility limited appellate review to plain error
Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons
Fed. R. Evid. 403
Cited 18,633 times
74 Legal Analyses
Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 401
Cited 10,859 times
31 Legal Analyses
Defining evidence as relevant if "it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and the fact is of consequence in determining the action"
Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 402
Cited 5,087 times
10 Legal Analyses
Observing "irrelevant evidence is not admissible"
Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations
Fed. R. Evid. 408
Cited 3,405 times
41 Legal Analyses
Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)