§Why CasetextPricing

Saadiq v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P. C. et al

REPLY BRIEF re MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Consumer Protection Act Claims

12 Cited authorities

  1. Cort v. Ash

    422 U.S. 66 (1975)   Cited 3,042 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding no private action under criminal statutes absent clear statutory basis for such inference

  2. Cannon v. University of Chicago

    441 U.S. 677 (1979)   Cited 2,343 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 created a private right of action for victims of education discrimination

  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis

    444 U.S. 11 (1979)   Cited 1,332 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress did not provide a private right of action for § 80b-6 because the statute expressly provided other means of enforcing compliance with its terms

  4. Passenger Corp. v. Passengers Assn

    414 U.S. 453 (1974)   Cited 518 times
    Finding that statutory construction principles "must yield to clear contrary evidence of legislative intent"

  5. Calhoon v. Harvey

    379 U.S. 134 (1964)   Cited 377 times
    Holding that district court lacked jurisdiction to hear § 411 claim because "the complaining union members . . . have not been discriminated against in any way and have been denied no privilege or right to vote or nominate which the union has granted to others"

  6. Securities Investor Protection v. Barbour

    421 U.S. 412 (1975)   Cited 207 times
    In Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour, 421 U.S. 412, 420, 425 (1975), the Court held that a customer of a failing broker-dealer does not have a private right of action under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 to compel the Securities Investor Protection Corp. to exercise its statutory authority for the customer's benefit where that agency has substantial administrative supervision over the activities in question.

  7. Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Rigsby

    241 U.S. 33 (1916)   Cited 460 times
    Holding that the Federal Safety Appliance acts provided an implied private right of action to an injured railroad employee against his employer.

  8. Alabama v. PCI Gaming Auth.

    801 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2015)   Cited 43 times
    Holding that a tribe is entitled to sovereign immunity in a suit alleging violations of criminal laws on the reservation

  9. Tillman v. Autovest, LLC

    Case No.: 2:16-cv-00211-RDP (N.D. Ala. Aug. 17, 2016)   Cited 3 times

    Case No.: 2:16-cv-00211-RDP 08-17-2016 BERNADINE SUGGS TILLMAN, Plaintiff air v. AUTOVEST, LLC; et al. Defendants. R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction The court has before it Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docs. # 10, 11, 12), filed March 30, 2016. The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. (Docs. # 10, 11, 12, 20, 21). Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. # 19)

  10. Bright v. Nimmo

    756 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 12 times
    Rejecting the plaintiff's argument that he has an implied cause of action against the VA or lender based upon the VA's manual and guidelines

  11. Section 5531 - Prohibiting unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices

    12 U.S.C. § 5531   Cited 165 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Granting power to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to take action to prevent unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices

  12. Section 5536 - Prohibited acts

    12 U.S.C. § 5536   Cited 134 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting “any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice”