Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Gonzales v. Oregon

Holding that statute did not delegate authority to Attorney General to make medical judgments

Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization

Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”

Landry v. Berryessa Union School Dist.

In Landry, the court held a trial court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing a case where there was no litigation activity by the plaintiffs for a period of 18-and-one-half months.

Wood v. Georgia

Holding that the rule that "[C]ongress has the power to circumscribe the political activities of federal employees in the career public service" does not apply to elected officials

Connerly v. State Personnel Board

Determining whether the California Business Council can be assessed attorney fees under section 1021.5 as an " ‘opposing part[y]’ within the meaning of that statute"

Bond v. Floyd

Holding that the Court had jurisdiction to review whether Georgia House of Representatives deprived one of its members of his constitutional rights when it refused to seat him on account of statements he had made criticizing the conduct of the war in Vietnam

Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations Board

Holding that only a prospective application of the administratively prescribed statute of limitations such that the limitation period "commences on the effective date of the statute, rather than on the date the cause of action accrued" would be fair

Pereira v. County of Santa Clara

Holding that a principal cannot be held liable for an actual agent who acts beyond the scope of his actual or ostensible authority

I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Section 152 - Definitions

Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”

Section 32603 - Employer Unfair Practices Under MMBA

Section 32016 - Definition of Terms Under MMBA

Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply