110 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 8,363 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ALJ decision is part of record, which reviewing court must consider in full
  2. Gonzales v. Oregon

    546 U.S. 243 (2006)   Cited 443 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statute did not delegate authority to Attorney General to make medical judgments
  3. Welch v. Metropolitan Life

    480 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 667 times
    Holding district court on remand could reduce requested rates based on "evidence that undermines the reasonableness of the rate requested" although the party opposing the request for fees had not previously introduced any evidence undermining requested rates
  4. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equal

    19 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 528 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”
  5. Wood v. Georgia

    370 U.S. 375 (1962)   Cited 378 times
    Holding that the First Amendment protects the right to criticize a grand jury investigation
  6. Serrano v. Priest

    20 Cal.3d 25 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 687 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denying benefits of the private attorney general rule to funded public-interest attorneys would be essentially inconsistent with the rule itself
  7. Bond v. Floyd

    385 U.S. 116 (1966)   Cited 239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court had jurisdiction to review whether Georgia House of Representatives deprived one of its members of his constitutional rights when it refused to seat him on account of statements he had made criticizing the conduct of the war in Vietnam
  8. Landry v. Berryessa Union School Dist

    39 Cal.App.4th 691 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 296 times
    In Landry, the court held a trial court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing a case where there was no litigation activity by the plaintiffs for a period of 18-and-one-half months.
  9. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Sup. Ct., Los Angeles Cty

    18 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 238 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "there is no tort remedy for the intentional spoliation of evidence by a party to the cause of action to which the spoliated evidence is relevant, in cases in which, as here, the spoliation victim knows or should have known of the alleged spoliation before the trial or other decision on the merits of the underlying action."
  10. Connerly v. State Personnel Bd.

    37 Cal.4th 1169 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 189 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Connerly v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 37 Cal.4th 1169, the plaintiff challenged the constitutionality of a number of statutes prohibiting governmental preference based on "race, sex, and other categories."
  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,041 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”
  12. Section 803 - Action brought by Attorney General

    Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 803   Cited 62 times

    An action may be brought by the attorney-general, in the name of the people of this state, upon his own information, or upon a complaint of a private party, against any person who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises any public office, civil or military, or any franchise, or against any corporation, either de jure or de facto, which usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises any franchise, within this state. And the attorney-general must bring the action, whenever

  13. Section 32603 - Employer Unfair Practices Under MMBA

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8 § 32603   Cited 8 times

    It shall be an unfair practice for a public agency to do any of the following: (a) Interfere with, intimidate, restrain, coerce or discriminate against public employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by Government Code section 3502 or by any local rule adopted pursuant to Government Code section 3507. (b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by Government Code section 3503, 3504.5, 3505.1, 3505.3, 3507.1, 3508(d) or 3508.5 or by any local rule adopted pursuant

  14. Rule 8.278 - Costs on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.278   Cited 2,704 times

    (a) Award of costs (1) Except as provided in this rule, the party prevailing in the Court of Appeal in a civil case other than a juvenile case is entitled to costs on appeal. (2) The prevailing party is the respondent if the Court of Appeal affirms the judgment without modification or dismisses the appeal. The prevailing party is the appellant if the court reverses the judgment in its entirety. (3) If the Court of Appeal reverses the judgment in part or modifies it, or if there is more than one notice

  15. Rule 8.528 - Disposition

    Cal. R. 8.528   Cited 421 times

    (a) Normal disposition After review, the Supreme Court normally will affirm, reverse, or modify the judgment of the Court of Appeal, but may order another disposition. (b) Dismissal of review (1) The Supreme Court may dismiss review. The clerk/executive officer of the Supreme Court must promptly send an order dismissing review to all parties and the Court of Appeal. (2) When the Court of Appeal receives an order dismissing review, the decision of that court is final and its clerk/executive officer

  16. Rule 8.264 - Filing, finality, and modification of decision

    Cal. R. 8.264   Cited 220 times

    (a) Filing the decision (1) The clerk/executive officer of the Court of Appeal must promptly file all opinions and orders of the court and promptly send copies showing the filing date to the parties and, when relevant, to the lower court or tribunal. (2) A decision by opinion must identify the participating justices, including the author of the majority opinion and of any concurring or dissenting opinion, or the justices participating in a "by the court" opinion. (Subd (a) amended effective January

  17. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 217 times

    (a) Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the

  18. Rule 3.1702 - Claiming attorney's fees

    Cal. R. 3.1702   Cited 163 times

    (a) Application Except as otherwise provided by statute, this rule applies in civil cases to claims for statutory attorney's fees and claims for attorney's fees provided for in a contract. Subdivisions (b) and (c) apply when the court determines entitlement to the fees, the amount of the fees, or both, whether the court makes that determination because the statute or contract refers to "reasonable" fees, because it requires a determination of the prevailing party, or for other reasons. (b) Attorney's

  19. Rule 8.25 - Service, filing, and filing fees

    Cal. R. 8.25   Cited 29 times

    (a) Service (1) Before filing any document, a party must serve, by any method permitted by the Code of Civil Procedure, one copy of the document on the attorney for each party separately represented, on each unrepresented party, and on any other person or entity when required by statute or rule. (2) The party must attach to the document presented for filing a proof of service showing service on each person or entity required to be served under (1). The proof must name each party represented by each

  20. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 12 times

    (a) In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8

  21. Rule 8.77 - Actions by court on receipt of electronic filing

    Cal. R. 8.77   Cited 1 times

    (a) Confirmation of receipt and filing of document (1) Confirmation of receipt When the court receives an electronically submitted document, the court must arrange to promptly send the electronic filer confirmation of the court's receipt of the document, indicating the date and time of receipt. A document is considered received at the date and time the confirmation of receipt is created. (2) Confirmation of filing If the document received by the court under (1) complies with filing requirements,

  22. Rule 8.499 - Renumbered effective April 25, 2019

    Cal. R. 8.499   Cited 1 times

    Cal. R. Ct. 8.499 Rule 8.499 renumbered as rule 8.730.

  23. Rule 8.498 - Renumbered effective April 25, 2019

    Cal. R. 8.498   Cited 1 times

    Cal. R. Ct. 8.498 Rule 8.498 renumbered as rule 8.728.