§Why CasetextPricing

DR. LEEVIL v. WESTLAKE HEALTH CARE CENTER

Appellant’s Opening Brief on the Merits

17 Cited authorities

  1. Smiley v. Citibank

    11 Cal.4th 138 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 142 times
    Looking to the definition of “interest” at time when the relevant act was passed

  2. Lucas v. County of Los Angeles

    47 Cal.App.4th 277 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 107 times
    Holding that the "reason to know" in § 845.6 is an "objective standard" and finding that the duty to provide medical care under § 845.6 includes "cases where there is actual or constructive knowledge that the prisoner is in need of immediate medical care."

  3. Ion Equipment Corp. v. Nelson

    110 Cal.App.3d 868 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 75 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the analogous situation of granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings following a prior overruling of a demurrer with respect to the same pleading

  4. Stoops v. Abbassi

    100 Cal.App.4th 644 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 34 times

    B144337 Filed July 26, 2002 Certified for Publication Modified August 7, 2002 Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC174420, John P. Shook, Judge. Affirmed. Bray, Geiger, Rudquist Nuss and Peter A. Viri for Appellant. Aguilar Sebastinelli, Raul V. Aguilar, Allen J. Kent, and Robert A. Crook for Respondents. ALDRICH, J. INTRODUCTION Insurance Code section 1280.7 permits physicians and surgeons to become members of an interindemnity arrangement that creates a trust

  5. Culver Center Partners East #1, L.P. v. Baja Fresh Westlake Village, Inc.

    185 Cal.App.4th 744 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 20 times
    Describing unlawful detainer as a “summary proceeding to determine the right to possession of real property”

  6. Borsuk v. Superior Court (La Hillcreste Apartments, LLC)

    242 Cal.App.4th 607 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 11 times
    Ordering transfer of petition for writ of mandate from the appellate division of the superior court to the court of appeal

  7. U.S. Fin., L.P. v. McLitus

    6 Cal.App.5th Supp. 1 (Cal. Super. 2016)   Cited 4 times
    In McLitus, the Appellate Division of the San Diego County Superior Court held that a property owner's service of a notice to quit before it perfects title to the property renders invalid any subsequent unlawful detainer proceeding.

  8. Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Ctr.

    9 Cal.App.5th 450 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 3 times

    2d Civil No. B266931 03-07-2017 DR. LEEVIL, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WESTLAKE HEALTH CARE CENTER, Defendant and Appellant. Enenstein Ribakoff LaViña & Pham, Teri T. Pham and Courtney M. Havens, for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Ronald Richards & Associates, Ronald N. Richards, Nicholas Bravo ; Law Offices of Geoffrey Long and Geoffrey S. Long, for Plaintiff and Respondent. TANGEMAN, J. Enenstein Ribakoff LaViña & Pham, Teri T. Pham and Courtney M. Havens, for Defendant and Appellant

  9. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Preciado

    224 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (Cal. Super. 2013)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 1–12–AP–001360 1–12–AP–001361. 08-19-2013 The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Vidal A. PRECIADO et al., Defendants and Appellants. The Bank of New York Mellon, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Roland Luke et al., Defendants and Appellants. Iscandari & Associates and Alieu Iscandari, Hayward, for Defendants and Appellants. Bryan Cave, Andrea Hicks, San Francisco; Miles Bauer Bergstrom & Winters, Santa Ana, and Christine Chung for Plaintiff and Respondent. Iscandari & Associates

  10. Stephens, Partain Cunningham v. Hollis

    196 Cal.App.3d 948 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 22 times

    Docket No. C000364. December 4, 1987. Appeal from Superior Court of Sacramento County, No. 332418, A. Richard Backus, Judge. COUNSEL Irvine P. Dungan for Defendants and Appellants. Gray Thurn and Richard L. Thurn for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION SIMS, J. Defendants appeal from a judgment in an unlawful detainer action contending the trial court erroneously concluded plaintiff showed sufficient lawful title to the subject real property. Defendants assert, among other things, that plaintiff's

  11. Section 1161a - Removal of persons holding over and continuing in possession of manufactured home, mobilehome, floating home or real property after three-day notice

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1161a   Cited 378 times
    Allowing purchaser to remove holdover owner from property but only if “title under the sale has been duly perfected”

  12. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or