§Why CasetextPricing

GOONEWARDENE v. ADP

Amicus Curiae Brief of National Payroll Reporting Consortium and American Payroll Association

10 Cited authorities

  1. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis

    444 U.S. 11 (1979)   Cited 1,332 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress did not provide a private right of action for § 80b-6 because the statute expressly provided other means of enforcing compliance with its terms

  2. Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County

    563 U.S. 110 (2011)   Cited 201 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a contract claim based on the violation of a policy that merely incorporated statutory language was "in essence a suit to enforce the statute itself," and therefore unenforceable in a private action

  3. Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy)

    46 Cal.4th 969 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 579 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proof of a Labor Code violation is a prerequisite to recovery of PAGA penalties

  4. Martinez v. Combs

    49 Cal.4th 35 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 478 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California's wage and hour laws do not impose liability on "individual corporate agents acting within the scope of their agency"

  5. Grochowski v. Phx. Constr.

    318 F.3d 80 (2d Cir. 2003)   Cited 599 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a government contract confirms a statutory obligation, "a third-party private contract action [to enforce that obligation] would be inconsistent with ... the legislative scheme ... to the same extent as would a cause of action directly under the statute"

  6. Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. U.S.

    431 U.S. 666 (1977)   Cited 311 times
    Holding that Feres doctrine applies in action against United States raising products liability claims

  7. Futrell v. Payday California, Inc.

    190 Cal.App.4th 1419 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 94 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a payroll company, which handled "ministerial tasks," did not exercise control over wages, hours, or working conditions

  8. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.

    158 F. Supp. 3d 952 (E.D. Cal. 2016)   Cited 51 times
    Finding that plaintiff's allegations that a Mexican supervisor called him a "stupid Mexican" almost every day and asserting that he was "above all Mexicans" was not sufficiently severe or pervasive enough to interfere with a "a reasonable employee's work performance" and seriously affect the "psychological well-being of an reasonable employee

  9. Rule 8.1115 - Citation of opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1115   Cited 73,832 times

    (a) Unpublished opinion Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. (b)Exceptions An unpublished opinion may be cited or relied on: (1) When the opinion is relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel; or (2) When the opinion is relevant to a criminal or disciplinary

  10. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or