51 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)

    13 Cal.4th 497 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 6,198 times
    Holding that trial courts may dismiss prior convictions alleged under the Three Strikes Law
  2. People ex rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.

    24 Cal.4th 415 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 563 times

    S082325 Filed November 6, 2000 Appeal from Superior Court, San Diego County, No. 702204, Robert J. O'Neill, Judge, Ct.App. 4/1 D031041, Review Granted, 73 Cal.App.4th 1396. DeCuir Somach, Somach, Simmons Dunn, Michael E. Vergara; Blodgett, Makechnie Vetne, John H. Vetne; Landels Ripley Diamond, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach and Sanford Svetcov for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, George Williamson, Roderick E. Walston and Richard M. Frank, Chief

  3. H029324, People v. Kim

    45 Cal.4th 1078 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 337 times
    Recognizing that “a lower court's ruling on a petition for the writ is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard”
  4. People v. Totari

    28 Cal.4th 876 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 342 times
    Holding denial of motion to vacate conviction appealable under section 1237, subdivision (b), because basis of motion was noncitizen defendant's substantial right to complete advisement of immigration consequences prior to entry of plea
  5. People v. Villa

    45 Cal.4th 1063 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 240 times
    Holding that collateral consequences, such as the loss of the license to practice medicine, sex offender registration, inability to vote, or inability to serve on a jury, do not constitute constructive custody
  6. People v. Hatch

    22 Cal.4th 260 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 311 times
    Noting the statute is sometimes denominated the “ ‘two-dismissal rule’ ”
  7. People v. Feyrer

    48 Cal.4th 426 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 200 times
    Finding it evident that a wobbler reduced to a misdemeanor under § 17(b) after suspension of imposition of sentence could be used as a prior felony conviction under the Three Strikes law in the event the defendant were to suffer a subsequent felony conviction
  8. People v. Orin

    13 Cal.3d 937 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 408 times
    Stating that the prosecutor's consent is necessary to secure “a plea to a lesser offense than that charged, either in degree or kind”
  9. Raven v. Deukmejian

    52 Cal.3d 336 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 227 times
    Upholding Crime Victims Justice Reform Act (Proposition 115)
  10. Nunez-Reyes v. Holder

    646 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 110 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a conviction for "[b]eing under the influence is not a lesser offense to simple possession because it arguably is more serious than mere possession" and is "qualitatively different from any federal conviction for which FFOA treatment would be available" since it "is not a possession crime at all"
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer